Difference between revisions of "Team:HKUST-Rice/Practices"
Stephanieyiu (Talk | contribs) |
SabrinaTam (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Helvetica, sans-serif; | font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Helvetica, sans-serif; | ||
} | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | hr { | ||
+ | border-style: solid; | ||
+ | border-width: 1px; | ||
+ | border-color: black; | ||
+ | margin: 10px; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | table.overview tr { | ||
+ | border:solid 5px #ffffff; | ||
+ | margin-left: 20px; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | table.overview p { | ||
+ | line-height: 200%; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | #contentContainer td { | ||
+ | padding: 20px; | ||
+ | border: 2px solid #565656; | ||
+ | border-collapse: collapse; | ||
+ | vertical-align: text-top; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | p.link { text-align: right; font-size: 130%; } | ||
+ | a.learn:link{ text-decoration: none;} | ||
+ | p.link:hover {font-size: 150%;} | ||
+ | p {text-align: justify;} | ||
+ | |||
</style> | </style> | ||
</head> | </head> | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | < | + | <div id="bannerContainer"> |
+ | <image src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/4e/HKUSt-RICE_human_practice.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: 550px; position: left;"> | ||
− | + | </div> | |
+ | <div id= "contentContainer"> | ||
− | |||
− | < | + | |
+ | <h1 style="font-family: Myanmar Text; font-size: 250%; color: #3D3D29;">Introduction</h1> | ||
<p style="font-size: 150%">Whilst risk assessment is a possible way to determine potential hazards, public communication | <p style="font-size: 150%">Whilst risk assessment is a possible way to determine potential hazards, public communication | ||
Line 45: | Line 73: | ||
applications and if they will perceive an in-field microbial biosensor as a Pandora’s box.</p> | applications and if they will perceive an in-field microbial biosensor as a Pandora’s box.</p> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <hr> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | <table class="overview" style=" "> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <h3 style="font-family: Myanmar Text; font-size: 200%; color: #565656;">Exploratory Research</h3> | ||
<p style="font-size: 150%">Future iGEMers may consider how a biosensor is designed for a safe use. In government and | <p style="font-size: 150%">Future iGEMers may consider how a biosensor is designed for a safe use. In government and | ||
Line 52: | Line 86: | ||
regulated to reassure the public that the use of microbial biosensor is safe.</p> | regulated to reassure the public that the use of microbial biosensor is safe.</p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
− | < | + | <td> |
− | + | <h3 style="font-family: Myanmar Text; font-size: 200%; color: #565656;">Bioethical Debate</h3> | |
− | <h3 style=:font-size: 200%"> | + | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
<p style="font-size: 150%">Now, human proceed to another watershed in which we are manipulating microorganisms to | <p style="font-size: 150%">Now, human proceed to another watershed in which we are manipulating microorganisms to | ||
Line 76: | Line 99: | ||
meaningless cliché.</p> | meaningless cliché.</p> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | + | </div> | |
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </body> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
Line 135: | Line 164: | ||
<p>Do you want to be considered for the <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Judging/Awards#SpecialPrizes">Best Education and Public Outreach award</a>? Make it easy for the judges to find any wiki content that is relevant to this prize. Highlight this content with a header or separate section.</p> --> | <p>Do you want to be considered for the <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Judging/Awards#SpecialPrizes">Best Education and Public Outreach award</a>? Make it easy for the judges to find any wiki content that is relevant to this prize. Highlight this content with a header or separate section.</p> --> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 08:49, 16 August 2015
Introduction
Whilst risk assessment is a possible way to determine potential hazards, public communication is another good practice in knowing how people think of our ideas. This year, we work beyond the bench and inquire about the stakeholders’ opinions about microbial biosensor. The collaboration of two universities expanded our focus group in the study of stakeholders’ perceptions on the use of microbial biosensor. We are curious if they feel discomfort with synbio applications and if they will perceive an in-field microbial biosensor as a Pandora’s box.
Exploratory ResearchFuture iGEMers may consider how a biosensor is designed for a safe use. In government and international organisations’ shoes, they may consider how these applications should be regulated to reassure the public that the use of microbial biosensor is safe. |
Bioethical DebateNow, human proceed to another watershed in which we are manipulating microorganisms to offset the harms we brought about along the history. Ethical issue on treating microorganism as a machine for the betterment of our lives popped out in recent years. It is time to consider whether we are the creatures specially fashioned by God or playing God is simply a meaningless cliché. |