Difference between revisions of "Team:HKUST-Rice/Practices"
SabrinaTam (Talk | contribs) |
Stephanieyiu (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
float: left; | float: left; | ||
background-color: #FFFFFF; | background-color: #FFFFFF; | ||
| − | font-family: | + | font-family: Myanmar Text; |
} | } | ||
</style> | </style> | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
<div id= "contentContainer"> | <div id= "contentContainer"> | ||
| − | <strong><h2 style="color: #3D3D29"> Human Practices </h2></strong><hr><br> | + | <strong><h2 style="font-family: Myanmar Text", "font-size: 200%", "color: #3D3D29"> Human Practices </h2></strong><hr><br> |
| − | <h3>The Black Swan</h3> | + | <h3 style=" font-family: Myanmar Text", "font-size: 200%">The Black Swan</h3> |
| − | <p>In scientific investigations, black swans pop up every now and then, not alone iGEM and | + | <p style="font-size: 150%">In scientific investigations, black swans pop up every now and then, not alone iGEM and |
synthetic biology. The idea of microbial detection of soil nutrient concentrations would bring | synthetic biology. The idea of microbial detection of soil nutrient concentrations would bring | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | <p>Whilst risk assessment is a possible way to determine potential hazards, public communication | + | <p style="font-size: 150%">Whilst risk assessment is a possible way to determine potential hazards, public communication |
is another good practice in knowing how people think of our ideas. This year, we work beyond | is another good practice in knowing how people think of our ideas. This year, we work beyond | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | <p>Future iGEMers may consider how a biosensor is designed for a safe use. In government and | + | <p style="font-size: 150%">Future iGEMers may consider how a biosensor is designed for a safe use. In government and |
international organisations’ shoes, they may consider how these applications should be | international organisations’ shoes, they may consider how these applications should be | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
<h3>Playing God</h3> | <h3>Playing God</h3> | ||
| − | <p>Human intelligence supremacy impacted the nature for at least 10,000 years. Agricultural | + | <p style="font-size: 150%">Human intelligence supremacy impacted the nature for at least 10,000 years. Agricultural |
development was a watershed in human civilisation. Since then, human have been attempting | development was a watershed in human civilisation. Since then, human have been attempting | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
| − | <p>Now, human proceed to another watershed in which we are manipulating microorganisms to | + | <p style="font-size: 150%">Now, human proceed to another watershed in which we are manipulating microorganisms to |
offset the harms we brought about along the history. Ethical issue on treating microorganism as | offset the harms we brought about along the history. Ethical issue on treating microorganism as | ||
Revision as of 11:20, 16 July 2015
Human Practices
The Black Swan
In scientific investigations, black swans pop up every now and then, not alone iGEM and synthetic biology. The idea of microbial detection of soil nutrient concentrations would bring much controversies.
Whilst risk assessment is a possible way to determine potential hazards, public communication is another good practice in knowing how people think of our ideas. This year, we work beyond the bench and inquire about the stakeholders’ opinions about microbial biosensor. The collaboration of two universities expanded our focus group in the study of stakeholders’ perceptions on the use of microbial biosensor. We are curious if they feel discomfort with synbio applications and if they will perceive an in-field microbial biosensor as a Pandora’s box.
Future iGEMers may consider how a biosensor is designed for a safe use. In government and international organisations’ shoes, they may consider how these applications should be regulated to reassure the public that the use of microbial biosensor is safe.
Playing God
Human intelligence supremacy impacted the nature for at least 10,000 years. Agricultural development was a watershed in human civilisation. Since then, human have been attempting to tame the nature and their environment. However, the poor agricultural management brought us to the highway to death.
Now, human proceed to another watershed in which we are manipulating microorganisms to offset the harms we brought about along the history. Ethical issue on treating microorganism as a machine for the betterment of our lives popped out in recent years. It is time to consider whether we are the creatures specially fashioned by God or playing God is simply a meaningless cliché.