Difference between revisions of "Team:TJU/Results"

Naturally, we can barely find microorganisms that live in isolated niches, instead, there are full of various material, energy and information communications. In our project, we have been aware that Shewanella can efficiently use lactate as carbon substrate for power production. Therefore, high-yield of lactate seems critical for current generation and also for a reliable interaction between different species. Moreover, flavins mediated EET pathway is able to directly affect the electrons transfer and output, which inspired us to adopt flavins as a factor to achieve information interaction. Based on the research above, we further developed and optimized a co-culture system with three strains of bacterium in the MFC to achieve a more robust and efficient system. Apart from that, we designed a pH sensing and proteolysis system as a practical tool for troubleshooting and an attempt to benefit the future researchers.

Figure 1. The overall relationship of three kinds of bacteria in our co-culture system.

1 Lactate producing system

Generally material flow, information flow, together with energy flow are key factors to regulate relations among bacterial consortium. Material flow, in particular, known as the most reliable and convenient method, is adopted in our construction. Typically the substances of the flow are often necessary nutrition for bacterial survival such as essential amino acid and carbon sources.

Figure 2. The raletively narrow range of carbon source of Shewanella.

Shewanella oneidensis can generate electricity with a relatively narrow range of carbon substrates, including lactate, acetate, formate, pyruvate and some amino acid.[1] It has been shown that Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 prefers the utilization of lactate as an energy-favorable carbon substrate as lactate-based biomass yield was higher than that for either acetate or pyruvate. Similarly, the lactate-based growth rate was much higher as well.[2] Thus, lactate is the most suitable carbon source and also the key mediator for the material flow in our system.

Figure 3. Our design of broadening the spectrum of carbon sources for MFCs based on Shewanella. Through it, we will presents the prospect of its expanding application range.

In order to develop a proper mechanism for lactate supply, we use Escherichia coli, a well characterized bacterium, to produce lactate. Previously, researchers has developed a system that was able to produce 142.2 g/L of L-lactate with no more than 1.2 g/L of by-products accumulated by knocking out ldhA and lldD and inserting L-LDH.[3] Consequently, E.coli has many advantages as a host for production of lactic acid, including the ability to produce optically pure lactate, rapid growth under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, and its simple nutritional requirements.[4]

Escherichia coli grows fermentatively in glucose-containing medium under anaerobic condition with formation of a mixture of organic acids (lactate, acetate, formate and succinate) and ethanol, and lactate only takes no more than 50% of the total metabolites.[4] Since we need to provide enough material support for the growth and metabolism of Shewanella under anaerobic condition, we decide to enhance the yield of lactate by genetic engineering through two strategies:

1.1 ldh- Lactate dehydrogenase(LDHE)

LDH is an enzyme found in nearly all living cells (animals, plants, and prokaryotes), which catalyzes the conversion of pyruvate to lactate with NADH serving as the coenzyme. Naturally, E.coli can produce D-lactate by itself but the amount and the activity of lactate dehydrogenase becomes the bottleneck. We found that those two factors of enzyme are hard to change dramatically in vivo. So in our project, we intend to introduce high-yield exogenous L-(+)-lactate dehydrogenase gene (ldhA) from Lactobacillus, which can convert the redundant pyruvate and subsequently provide even more sustenance for Shewanella. Similar metabolic pathway has been found in a variety of organisms, to distinguish the differences, we renamed the heterogenous L-lactate dehydrogenase gene ldhE while homogenous one keeps original ldhA.

Figure 4. The part we design to produce L-lactate(LB medium).

After we transferred our part into E.coli BL21, we found there was little difference between the experimental group and control group.

Figure 5. The yield of lactate in flask-shaking fermentation condition (LB medium)

In order to enhance the transformation efficiency from glucose to lactate, as well as improve the characterization of our ldhE part, we decide to knockout the the pflB and poxB.

Figure 6. Lactate metabolic pathway. The pflB and poxB knocking out and ldhE insertion will result in the accumulation of lactate.

1.2 pflB knockout

PFL is a crucial enzyme in the glucose metabolism under anaerobic condition, which can catalyze one molecule of pyruvate to one molecule of formicate and one molecule of acetylcoenzyme A (AcCoA). According to metabolic pathway, pyruvate is consumed both in the PFL and LDH reactions. In the wild type E. coli, LDH reaction is not as competitive as the reaction through PFL, and therefore, knockout of the PFL related genes will contribute to redistribute the metabolic flux. When the PFL pathway is blocked, E. coli will conceivably alter the distribution of these products to overcome the imbalanced reducing equivalents caused by the pathway knockout. Therefore, knockout of pflB not only decreased the carbon flow to acetyl-CoA under anaerobic condition but also reduced the anaerobic consumption of NADH through reductive TCA. [5]

After the knockout of pflB, though the growth rate was slightly slowed down, the yield of lactate of engineered strain was improved greatly and showed a significant difference from the wild type MG1655. From the result, we can see our part functioned as expected.

Figure 7. Comparison diagram of lactate production of three different strains. MG1655: wild type ; MG1655ΔpflB: pflB knockout, ldhE blank; MG1655ΔpflB+ldhE: containing the functional ldhE part we design

1.3 Knockout strategy

For genes knockout, we adopted a effective, easy-to-use two-step system in which the cell is first transformed with a helper plasmid harboring genes encoding the λ-Red enzymes, I-SceI endonuclease, and RecA. λ-Red enzymes expressed from the helper plasmid are used to recombineer a small ‘landing pad’, a tetracycline resistance gene (tetA) flanked by I-SceI recognition sites and landing pad regions, into the desired location in the chromosome. After tetracycline selection for successful landing pad integrants, the cell is transformed with a donor plasmid carrying the desired insertion fragment; this fragment is excised by I-SceI and incorporated into the landing pad via recombination at the landing pad regions.[6]

First round of recombineering consists of three rounds of PCR for the construction of recombinant genome cassettes which subsequently positively selected by selection markers such as Tetr. In the second step, TetA marker was released by simultaneous induction of I-SceI and Red recombinase expression which serves as a negative selection.[7] (More details in Method.)

Figure 8. First step in the new two-step scar-less gene deletion using λ-Red recombineering method. Three rounds of PCR together with tet selection make up of our recombinant.

2 Flavins producing system

Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, a facultative anaerobe, has been widely used as a model anode biocatalyst in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) due to its easiness of cultivation, adaptability to aerobic and anaerobic environment and both respiratory and electron transfer versatility. [8]

Particularly, EET pathway can be subdivided into direct EET and mediated EET and the latter one limits the efficiency of electron transfer between bacteria and electrode due to the deficiency of electron mediator. To regulate relations of energy and information in the consortium, flavins hold the key to success.

It is widely accepted that interfacial EET is the rate-limiting step in the EET processes which can be relieved by some redox active molecules such as quinines and metal-centered porphyrin-ring derivatives. However, those redox active molecules are generally costly and toxic to anodic electricigens. Besides, Shewanella is capable of utilizing self-secreted flavins like riboflavin (RF) to accelerate EET, which is much more efficiently than other exogenous active molecules. More specifically, riboflavin (RF) and flavin mononucleotide (FMN) enhance EET more than five times, with much lower concentrations than those needed for anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS) shuttling. So we choose flavins as one entry point to enhance the electricity output of MFCs. [9]

Figure 9. Comparison of co-factor EET model(a) and diffusion EET model(b), (b) also reveals the electron pathway by endogenous flavins

In EET model, outward current flows from interior of cells to outer membrane (OM) and extracellular anodes through a metal-reducing conduit (Mtr pathway), where electrons (from NADH, the intracellular electron carrier) flow through the menaquinol pool, CymA (inner membrane [IM] tetraheme c-type cytochromes [c-Cyts]), MtrA (periplasmic decaheme c-Cyts), MtrB (β-barrel trans-OM protein) and finally to MtrC and OmcA (two OM decaheme c-Cyts). However, the principle of how flavins function still remains controversial. [10]

Traditional model demonstrates that flavins carry the electrons from OM c-Cyts to electrode by diffusion, which has been in debate due to thermodynamic disproof. Recently, another interfacial EET model was proposed, where flavin may serve as a co-factor binding to OmcA or MtrC to dictate EET. Fully oxidized flavin (Ox) accepts one electron from reduced heme of OM c-Cyts, and binds to OM c-Cyts as a cofactor in the semiquinone (Sq) form with shifted potential. Ox/Sq redox cycling in OM c-Cyts donates electrons to electrodes in a one electron reaction mode via direct contact.[10]

Figure 10. Pathway for engineered riboflavin and FMN production E. coli.

Although Shewanella uses endogenous flavins to mediate electrons, the amount of its production is deficient and multi-tasks brought by self-engineering may also reduce the transfer efficiency. As a consequence, we had two strategies to construct the zymophyte and further improve the production. Firstly, we introduced flavin producing genes using the E.coli as chassis. Secondly, we get an engineered B.subtilis strain from the lab of Dr. Tao Chen [11](more detail in attribution)

Based on the EET pathway theory, we suggest that by maximizing the amount of flavins, we may significantly enhance the EET efficiency and achieve a relatively high power generation.

We found a part BBa_K1172303 in Part Registry constructed by 2013 Team Bielefelf-Germany which was also aimed at producing riboflavins. However, the gene cluster showed a maximum output of 6 mg/L even with a strong promoter, which was insufficient to maintain a high and constant efficiency of EET pathway in our co-culture system. So we decided to optimize the part BBa_K1172303 to enhance the production of riboflavins.

Figure 11. Two different parts we designed to produce flavins.

As we learn from metabolic flux (figure 2), it reveals the relevant pathways of riboflavin production and engineering strategies for riboflavin production. In their previous research(Tao, et al) [7] ,they construct a high-yield E.coli strain with a yield of 229.1 mg/L. Based on their study, we constructed a flavin producing part (ribABDEC cluster) named EC10.(as shown in figure 11a). The part(BBa_K1696011) we designed, compared with BBa_K117230, has been well optimized and the yield of that reached 17 mg/L.( as shown in figure 13). We can see from the results, the functionality of their parts has successfully improved.

Figure 12. The production of EC10 in tubes.

In the meanwhile, based on co-factor model, EET pathway points out that FMN plays a critical role in electron transfer. Through the study by Dr. Tao Chen, they have weakened the RBS upstream of ribC to divert more of the material flux to RF production.[7] Based on their viewpoint, we got further to design a strong RBS sequence upstream of the ribC and we rename the new part as EC10*(BBa_K1696010). The yield of EC10* reached 90 mg/L(as shown in fugure 11b). The strong RBS before ribC sequence can lead to the FMN accumulation while riboflavin consumes a bit, which may in turn, result in increase both for riboflavin and FMN as a whole.

Figure 13. The yield of riboflavin in different strains :EC10, Rf02S (Δpgi+EC10), EC10*

When we characterized our part, we were not able to detect the FMN for lacking proper equipments. However, we were surprised to find that the production of EC10* was even better with a larger output of riboflavins. For riboflavin measurements, culture samples were diluted with 0.05 M NaOH to the linear range of the spectrophotometer and the A444 was immediately measured, according to the Dr. Tao Chen’s method [7]. As for the reason of production improvement of RF, we speculate that the strengthening of ribC gene can improve both the RF and FMN yield through the flavin metabolic pathway.

3 Co-culture MFC -- Labor Division

Microorganisms rarely live in isolated niches. One reason is that the maintenance of viability of these microbes may need supplementary metabolites or other signaling chemicals provided by other microbes in the ecosystems and communities.[11] Conforming to the trend of revolution, we apply the bacterial consortium in our MFC for greater power generation and increased duration.

Apart from the universal trend of nature, the mixed culture shares some unique advantages particularly in our MFC. For example, Shewanella originally can merely use few simple carbon substrates like lactate, acetate, formate, pyruvate and some amino acid.[1] However, our consortium as a whole can expand the absorption range of carbon resources and develop a more complex diagram of carbon input for Shewanella. Also, our intention is able to achieve comprehensive functions through “Labor Division” that monoculture can hardly manage. For instance, if we use only Shewanella to supply electricity, the production of flavins as well as other related reaction will inhibit current creation. These are fundamental reasons that we adopt the “mix” strategy in our project.

3.1 First Trial

Our experiment started with monoculture of Shewanella, in which we have found several important conclusions that might be used in the later trials:
(i) Shewanella alone cannot take good use of glucose as the mere carbon source to generate power.
(ii) Voltage has been improved when we add flavins to the monoculture medium, which proved that flavins indeed would help the power enhance.
(iii) As an attempt to choose a proper substance being used in the experiment, we put sodium lactate into service and found that Shewanella could achieve power output.

Figure 13. The electrical output of MFCs of single strain Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 with different substrates

3.2 Second Trial:

Since we’ve constructed the lactate producing strain (ldhE), the flavin producing strain (EC10) and an engineered strain bearing both ldhE and EC10, we initiated our co-culture experiment with different labor division.

Figure 14. The electrical output of co-culture MFCs with preliminary labor division

From the figure above, we found that the co-culture system with three different strains has a higher electricity output than two-strain system before 20h, showing that a more complete labor division may have a better effect in the co-culture system. It is because that we can more accurately control the amount and ratio of lactate and flavins when they are produced in separated strains.

Figure 15. pH test of anode samples, with only sample 1 get reached above 6.5

However, the electricity output dropped promptly after 30h. (as shown in figure 1). In the meanwhile, we took samples from anode finding that pH in anode was excessively low (lower than 6.2) which might not meet the survival requirement of Shewanella.

The reason of the acidity, based on our analysis, could be the overmuch glucose or the high ratio of fermentation bacteria in the system. Particularly, our medium consist of 10 g/L glucose as well as 5% LB and 95% M9 medium. Both of the possibilities above can lead to the overproduction of lactate and other acid metabolites like formic acid which are hard to consume.

So, in order to solve the pH problem, we have two strategies. Firstly, we can optimize the medium component by reducing ratio of C and N. Secondly, we would optimize the proportion of the fermentation bacteria.

Apart from that, we also found that excessive portion of zymophyte would inhibit biofilm formation of Shewanella by zymophyte taking up the spaces in electrode.

3.3 Third trial

When we have preliminarily optimized the bacterial proportion and medium compositions, we got a significant improvement of the electricity output in spite of the relatively short sustaining time.(shown as follows)

Figure 16. The electrical output of co-culture MFCs with optimized labor division and bacteria proportion

We also attempted to put the fermentation bacteria into the system some time after Shewanella. However, the later joining of fermentation bacteria will the stability of the system so that the output oscillated for a period of time. We can see from the figure**, even though the lasting time was longer than before, the maximum electricity output was still limited.

Figure 17. The electrical output of co-culture system with fermentation bacteria added 8 h later into the system

Subsequently, we arranged variable mixture for three-strain system to determine the best proportion for electricity generation. Besides, we continued to optimize the culture condition (95%M9, 5%LB and glucose 2 g/L), we can see from the figure that the three-strain system had a maximum output at around 350mV and had a significant advantage over the two-strain system. Additionally, the lasting time was over 80h without any supplementary glucose, which indicated the high utilization rate of carbon source and the relatively stable relationship among the three strains.

Figure 18. Among shewanella, shewanella+MG1655 and Shewanella+ΔplfB ldhE+Rf02S, the three-strain co-culture system reached a relatively higher potential that kept around 350mV in 80 hours

3.4 Fourth trial

We innovatively introduced a third species, Bacillus subtilis, into our system. Considering Bacillus subtilis take KNO₃ as the substrates instead of glucose in anaerobic condition, we could reduce the competition for carbon sources between two kinds of fermentation bacteria. Also it has been reported that engineered B.subtilis could get a high output of flavins which is exactly what we want. So, we choosed Bacillus subtilis as another kind of fermentation bacteria.

It can been seen from the figure**, the electricity output of three-strain co-culture system with B.subtilis could reach more than 500mV enduring around 80h, showing a great difference from the Shewanella single-strain system. Compared with two-strain system below, the three-strain system with B.subtilis also showed a visible advantage.

Figure 19. The electrical output of single strain Shewanella compared to Shewanella+ΔplfB ldhE+B.Subtilis co-culture system with glucose as carbon source.

Figure 20. The electrical output of Shewanella+ΔplfB ldhE+B.Subtilis compared to Shewanella+ΔplfB ldhE+Rf02S with glucose and KNO₃ as substrates

Future Work:

Although we made several innovative research in our project, there are still many other aspects to develop and optimize in the future.
1. We plan to find out biofilm parts of E.coli and modify several key point to reduce adhesion effect.
2. We need to further adjust ratio of our three-strain system to bring a quicker speed toward maximum.
3. Keeping power generation unchanged, we can reduce the volume of our device so that it will increase current density.
4. Making improvements in Shewanella for more electricity output. We intend to weaken any other unrelated functions except for power production in Shewanella and using co-culture system to produce necessary nutrition for its survival.

References

[1] Tang Y J, Meadows A L, Keasling J D. A kinetic model describing Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 growth, substrate consumption, and product secretion.[J]. Biotechnology & Bioengineering, 2007, 96(1):125–133.
[2] Feng X, Xu Y, Chen Y, et al. Integrating Flux Balance Analysis into Kinetic Models to Decipher the Dynamic Metabolism of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1[J]. Plos Computational Biology, 2011, 8(2):e1002376-e1002376.
[3] Highly efficient L-lactate production using engineered Escherichia coli with dissimilar temperature optima for L-lactate formation and cell growth.
[4] Liu H, Kang J, Qi Q, et al. Production of lactate in Escherichia coli by redox regulation genetically and physiologically.[J]. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2011, 164(2):162-169.
[5] Zhu J, Shimizu K, Zhu J, et al. Effect of a single-gene knockout on the metabolic regulation in Escherichia coli for D-lactate production under microaerobic condition[J]. Metabolic Engineering, 2005, 7(2):104–115.
[6] Thomas E, Kuhlman, Edward C, Cox. Site-specific chromosomal integration of large synthetic constructs.[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2010, 38(38).
[7] Lin Z, Xu Z, Li Y, et al. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of riboflavin[J]. Microbial Cell Factories, 2014, 13(1):1-12.
[8] Wang X, Tao L, Wang H, et al. Improving mediated electron transport in anodic bioelectrocatalysis[J]. Chemical Communications, 2015.
[9] Okamoto A, Nakamura R, Nealson K H, et al. Bound Flavin Model Suggests Similar Electron‐Transfer Mechanisms in Shewanella and Geobacter[J]. Chemelectrochem, 2014, 1(11):1808-1812.
[10] Yang Y, Ding Y, Hu Y, et al. Enhancing Bidirectional Electron Transfer of Shewanella oneidensis by a Synthetic Flavin Pathway[J]. Acs Synthetic Biology, 2015.
[11]Shi S, Chen T, Zhang Z, et al. Transcriptome analysis guided metabolic engineering of Bacillus subtilis for riboflavin production[J]. Metabolic engineering, 2009, 11(4): 243-252.
[12] Song H, Ding M Z, Jia X Q, et al. Synthetic microbial consortia: from systematic analysis to construction and applications[J]. Chem.soc.rev, 2014, 43(20):6954-6981.

E-mail: ggjyliuyue@gmail.com |Address: Building No.20, No.92 Weijin road, Tianjin University, China | Zip-cod: 300072

Copyright 2015@TJU iGEM Team