Difference between revisions of "Team:TJU/Modeling"

Line 118: Line 118:
 
             </ul>  
 
             </ul>  
 
           </li>  
 
           </li>  
 +
            <li class="hmain" style="margin-top:20px;">
 +
            <a href="#Models for monocultures of Shewanella in MFC">Model for co-culture MFC</a>
 +
              <ul>
 +
                    <li>
 +
                    <a href="#Growth Model of E.coli">Growth Model of <em>E.coli</em></a>
 +
                  </li>
 +
                    <li>
 +
                    <a href="#Extracellular Electron Transfer Model">Equation Establishment</a>
 +
                    </li>
 +
                    <li>
 +
                    <a href="#Simulation Results3">Simulation Results</a>
 +
                    </li>
 +
                    <li>
 +
                    <a href="#Parameters and variables3">Parameters and variables</a>
 +
                    </li>                   
 +
            </ul>
 +
          </li>           
 
             <li>  
 
             <li>  
 
             <a href="https://2015.igem.org" ></br></br></br></br><img src=  "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/1a/TJU_main.png" width="200"  border="none" /></a>  
 
             <a href="https://2015.igem.org" ></br></br></br></br><img src=  "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/1a/TJU_main.png" width="200"  border="none" /></a>  
Line 553: Line 570:
 
<!--此处为 Model for co-culture MFC 部分-->
 
<!--此处为 Model for co-culture MFC 部分-->
  
  <a name="Models for monocultures of <em>Shewanella</em> in MFC" id="Models for monocultures of <em>Shewanella</em> in MFC"></a><h3>2  Models for monocultures of <em>Shewanella</em> in MFC </h3> <hr></br>
+
  <a name="Model for co-culture MFC" id="Model for co-culture MFC"></a><h3>3 Model for co-culture MFC</h3> <hr></br>
 
   
 
   
  <p><span style="font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; color:#ddbf73;"> Growth Model of <em>E.coli</em></span></p>
+
  <a name="Growth Model of E.coli" id="Growth Model of <em>E.coli"></a><p><span style="font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; color:#ddbf73;">Growth Model of <em>E.coli</em></span></p>
 
    
 
    
 
  <p align="justify">In order to figure out the kinetics feature of growth, substrate consumption and accumulation of metabolite in lactate producing <em>E.coli</em>, we construct kinetics model of fermentation process based on carbon balance. First of all, the fermentation process of lactate in <em>E.coli</em> under anaerobic conditions has been simplified and we make several assumptions as following:</p>
 
  <p align="justify">In order to figure out the kinetics feature of growth, substrate consumption and accumulation of metabolite in lactate producing <em>E.coli</em>, we construct kinetics model of fermentation process based on carbon balance. First of all, the fermentation process of lactate in <em>E.coli</em> under anaerobic conditions has been simplified and we make several assumptions as following:</p>
Line 617: Line 634:
 
</br></br>
 
</br></br>
  
<p><span style="font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; color:#ddbf73;"> Simulation Results</span></p>
+
<a name="Simulation Results3" id="Simulation Results3"></a><p><span style="font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; color:#ddbf73;">Simulation Results</span></p>
  
 
<div class="kuang" style="width:470px">
 
<div class="kuang" style="width:470px">
Line 630: Line 647:
 
<p> <b>Figure 7.</b> <span style="font-size: 14px"> The conc. of lactate and acetate varies with time.</span>
 
<p> <b>Figure 7.</b> <span style="font-size: 14px"> The conc. of lactate and acetate varies with time.</span>
 
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/6d/%E5%A4%A7%E8%82%A0%E5%9B%BE2.jpg" width="20" height="20" align="right" alt="" /></a></p></div></div></br>
 
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/6d/%E5%A4%A7%E8%82%A0%E5%9B%BE2.jpg" width="20" height="20" align="right" alt="" /></a></p></div></div></br>
</br>>
+
</br>
  
  

Revision as of 17:39, 17 September 2015


Modeling


1 Gene Expression Model for Lactate production



Simplification and Assumption

① Simplifications and assumptions for metabolic pathway and gene insertion:supposing that we have adequate glucose and constant pyruvate, the latter used to product lactate can be replenished by glucose in E.coli. Naturally, E.coli can itself produce lactate dehydrogenase (ldh) through ldhA gene expression. Later, we attempt to introduce plasmids with ldh gene, which can produce the extra ldh as an approach to generate even more lactate. However, the excessive ldh, to a certain degree, will also inhibit ldh gene expression.

② Simplifications and assumptions for Michaelis-Menten equation: we want to figure out the relations between the speed of lactate production and the amount of ldh expression. But, there is a precondition in Michaelis-Menten equation, namely, the total amount of enzyme in solution keeps unchanged.

So, we need to modify the existing Michaelis-Menten equation:


   

The above equation reflects a general enzyme catalytic reaction process. With the help of steady state approximation, the equation can transform from first-order reaction to zero-order reaction. Because of the constant substrate concentration as we assumed, the variable in the equation is the variation of ldh amount, which means that the independent variable in the Michaelis-Menten equation turns into the enzyme amount. (variable change from [S] into [E])


   

in which :

(1)


③ Simplification of transmembrane transfer: the original pH in the medium is slightly greater than 7 and the pH can keep constant with the buffer function of KHPO4 together with KH2PO4. Suppose that Shewanella can absorb lactate brought by E.coli timely, thus, pH can remain stable, which is around 7.2 based on our hypothesis. Further, we assume that transmembrane transfer belongs to codiffusion where the concentration difference of H+ and acid groups can drive the whole process. Therefore, the transmembrane transfer is only related to the intra membrane concentration of H+ and acid groups.


Equation Establishment

Firstly, we establish the equation of ldh amount changing with time. The following equations represent the ldh production rate in E.coli without the plasmid insertion and with the plasmid introduction, respectively.


 

(2)

 

(3)


Next, we construct the lactate production rate equation:


  (4)

Finally, the lactate transmembrane transfer equations has been figured out. It shows that lactate will be transferred to the outside at the time it produced. We represent the intra membrane with c and extra membrane with e.


   

The transmembrane transfer rate:


 

(5)


When lactate production is combined with its transfer, we can get the following equation:


 

(6)



Simulation Results


Figure 1. The relations between amount of ldh and lactate with time passed, respectively.




2 Models for monocultures of Shewanella in MFC



Shewanella Growth Model Based on Carbon Balance

At the very beginning, we construct a fermentation kinetic model based on the Monod Equation to draw a picture of carbon balance between biomass increase and base consumption during S.oneidensis MR-1 growth. Before generation our modeling, we simplify the center process of carbon metabolism in Shewanella via making assumptions as follows:

① Lactate is the preferable carbon source for Shewanella. Lactate can transform into pyruvate by dehydrogenation, which then converts mostly into acetyl coenzyme. Subsequently, acetyl coenzyme can either be oxidized into CO2 and release energy by TCA Circle or transform into acetate.

② When there are too much lactate, the producing rate of acetyl coenzyme will be greater than the consuming rate of that in TCA circle. The excessive acetyl coenzyme will convert into acetate and release to the outside. Inversely, the shortage of lactate leads the utilization of acetate which then maintains the metabolism by acetyl coenzyme formation.

③ Although both acetate and lactate can be used as carbon sources for Shewanella, acetate can restrain its growth. On the one hand, acetate will drop the acidity inside the cell, which, a step forward, can affect the activity of enzyme in vivo resulted in uncompetitive inhibition to cell growth. On the other hand, acetate can itself limit the growth by uncompetitive inhibition. In particular, the process of acetate metabolism and lactate metabolism are competing for acetyl coenzyme, which reduces the lactate utilization and influences cell growth. (Tang & Meadows, 2006)

④ The redox of mediator in the outer membrane is the rate-limiting step of electron transfer chain in Shewanella. TCA circle, an important pathway for the synthesis of energy and biomass , largely depends on the concentration of electron receptor at the end of electron transfer chain. When there is a deficiency of oxidized mediator, TCA circle will be inhibited, thereby, affect the whole process of metabolism as well as biomass increase.


According to the four assumptions above along with acetate uncompetitive inhibition and competitive inhibition, we decide to use multi-substrates Monod equation(Blanch & Clark, 1997) with two kinds of inhibition to demonstrate the relations between restrictive substrates and biomass increase rate. Considering that the accumulation of NADH will remarkably affect metabolic process under anaerobic conditions, we add a product factor in the Monod equation reflecting metabolites inhibition function. μL and μA refers to the lactate and acetate biomass specific rate, respectively. We quantify the relations between specific rate of lactate/acetate and restrictive base concentration as following:


 

(7)

  (8)

Biomass, lactate and acetate concentration can vary with time and its construction depends on kinetic model which is based on the general kinetics of the fermentation process model. Consumption of lactate and acetate can be both used for biomass increase and endogenous metabolism maintenance. However, considering the rarely energy losses caused by metabolism in vivo, we ignore the carbon consumption brought by metabolism. In this way, lactate can only be used for biomass increase and acetate production while acetate is merely used for biomass increase.


 

(9)

 

(10)

 

(11)



Extracellular Electron Transfer Model

Extracellular Electron Transfer (EET) process can deliver the electrons between electrode and cell membrane with mediating functions of redox active molecules including FMN and riboflavin. It can be subdivided into the oxidation of reduced mediator and reduction of oxidized mediator in electrode.


We establish a model kinetics of electrode process on the basis of Bulter-Volmer equation to illustrate the oxidation of reduced mediator in electrode. Firstly, we make several assumptions just like the following tips:

①Although both of FMN and riboflavin can serve as mediator in electrode redox, we only take riboflavin into consideration for simplification in the model.

② There are two kinds of EET pathway model for riboflavin mediating. One of these called single-electron transfer in which riboflavin acts as cofactor of MtrC protein and can be reduced into semiquinone (Sq) with the standard electrode potential of -260v. Another one is two-electron transfer where the dissociative riboflavin binds to outer membrane c-Cyts as a cofactor in the hydroquinone (Hq) form with shifted potential of -145v. Under conditions of the same electrode and concentration, the exchange current density of single-electron transfer is much high than that of two-electron transfer since enzymatic reaction can greatly decrease its activation energy. Therefore, we assumed that current generation reaction in anode mainly belongs to the single-electron transfer.

③Oxidation of Sq in electrode is the reversible first order reaction. The net rate for this kind of reaction is made up by the difference between oxidized rate of Sq and reduced rate of riboflavin in electrode.


Accordingly, current density in anode can be calculated by Bulter-Vlomer equation:


 

(12)


Redox reaction rate constant can be calculated by Arrhenius equation:


 

(13)

 

(14)



As for the reduction of oxidized mediator in outer membrane for Shewanella, we establish a kinetics of enzyme catalyzed reaction on the basis of Michaelis-Menten equation, accordingly.

①Similarly, we also consider the single-electron transfer as the only pathway in vivo.

② In such single-electron transfer process, riboflavin reduction kinetics characteristics follows the general rules of enzymatic reaction.

③The reduction of riboflavin is related to the reducing state of OM c-Cyts heme center which is also the terminal of EET pathway. Due to the electrons brought by NADH or NADPH from respiration, we argue that the process of riboflavin reduction into Sq is coupled with NADH from respiration process.


Based on the assumptions above, we believe the respiration of OM riboflavin has something to do with its concentration and NADH production rate. According to the kinetics of enzyme catalyzed reaction, we use multi-substrates Michaelis-Menten equation to determine the whole process:


 

(15)

 

(16)

 

(17)



Simulation Results


Figure 2. The growth curve of S.oneidensis in MFC.



Figure 3. The conc. of lactate and acetate varies with time.



Figure 4. The conc. of Sq and Hq varies with time.



Figure 5. The Current varies with time.




Parameters and variables


Parameter

Discribtion

Number

[Unit]

v

volume of reactor

140E-3

[L]

μmax,L

the maximal specific growth rate taking lactate as substrate

0.52

[h-1]

μmax,A

the maximal specific growth rate taking acetate as substrate

0.28

[h-1]

ke

endogenous metabolism rate constant

0.08

[h-1]

kc

acetate competitive inhibition constant

1.3

[dimensionless]

ku

acetate uncompetitive inhibition constant

8.3E-3

[dimensionless]

kR

acetate productive inhibition constant

12.6E-3

[mol∙L-1]

ks,L

half-saturation constant of Monod equation taking lactate as substrate

12E-3

[mol∙L-1]

ks,A

half-saturation constant of Monod equation taking aactate as substrate

12.3E-3

[mol∙L-1]

kMox

half-constant of Monod equation taking oxidized mediator as substrate

6E-6

[mol∙L-1]

YX/L

apparent biomass coefficient of lactate

19.1

[g dry cell/ mol lactate]

YX/A

apparent biomass coefficient of acetate

16.8

[g dry cell/ mol acetate]

n

the numbers of electron transfer

1

[mol e-/mol reaction]

kf

oxidation rate constant

5.2504E-5

[h-1]

kb

reduction rate constant

5.2574E-5

[h-1]

α

oxidization transfer coefficient in anode

0.5

[dimensionless]

F

faraday's constant

96485

[C∙mol-1]

R

ideal gas constant

8.314

[J∙mol-1∙K-1]

T

thermodynamic temperature

303.15

[K]

ΔE

The potential between riboflavin and the heme center of OM c-Cyts

0.395

[v]

k0

standard rate constant

0.10

[h-1]

vmf

the maximum reaction rate constant

6E-5

[h-1]

kiA

the dissociation constant of NADH

1E-2

[dimensionless]

kmA

Michaelis constant when NADH saturation

1E-2

[dimensionless]

kmB

Michaelis constant when riboflavin saturation

1E-2

[dimensionless]

k1

the inhibition constants of riboflavin

5E-4

[dimensionless]

k2

the inhibition constants of NADH

10

[dimensionless]




3 Model for co-culture MFC



Growth Model of E.coli

In order to figure out the kinetics feature of growth, substrate consumption and accumulation of metabolite in lactate producing E.coli, we construct kinetics model of fermentation process based on carbon balance. First of all, the fermentation process of lactate in E.coli under anaerobic conditions has been simplified and we make several assumptions as following:

① Except for carbon sources which serves as restrictive substrates, the growth of E.coli will not be affected by other nutrition in the medium.

E.coli will use carbon sources to maintain its survival, division and proliferation while the accumulation of metabolites is also counted in.

③ The growth model of E.coli is equilibrium increase rather than structural increase, which means the ascending rate of biomass in E.coli increases as the same as the rate for cell weight accumulation.

④ We take lactate as the only one metabolites for accumulation and lactate increase is positively related to its growth rate. Besides, overmuch lactate will inhibit the growth of E.coli.


We further construct the carbon equilibrium calculations for anaerobic lactate fermentation in batches. Therefore, we figure out the following differential equations:


  (18)

  (19)

  (20)

Owing to the assumption of equilibrium increase in E.coli, the relations between specific growth rate of biomass and concentration of restrictive substrates can reflect in the Monod equations that we modeled. However, considering that the accumulation of lactate may inhibit bacteria growth, we introduce an extra inhibition factor for general Monod equation. Due to the positive relations between lactate accumulation and cell growth, the production of metabolites also share the same relation with biomass increase. In this way, Qp can be represented by using the function of μE.


  (21)

  (22)

  (23)


Simulation Results


Figure 6. The growth curve of E.coli.



Figure 7. The conc. of lactate and acetate varies with time.



</div>